![]() Therefore, thank you GAOTD and Burnaware, but I will pass on your offering today. I realize PDF Shaper Pro 5.1 has many more features, but I can't trust the integrity of those operations either, without conducting an in-depth review. Output produced by PDF Shaper Pro 5.1 simply does not meet the required thresholds.įor me, the points listed above are show-stoppers. Any PDF posted to a website must meet certain requirements in those countries (WCAG Section 508 AODA BS 8878 etc.). There were additional issues but, in my opinion, they would not have as much impact as the ones listed above.Ĭompliance with Accessibility standards for web-based information is required in most countries now. Using the program is actually rather simple and involves inputting a PDF file, selecting a destination file and hitting the Convert button. Like the other freeware utilities they offer, PDF Shaper is both easy-to-use and completely free. (this presents a major Accessibility issue). PDF Shaper is a Windows-based PDF conversion utility developed by glorylogic. MS kept the list structure intact: tags labels and content.ĥb. (this presents a major Accessibility issue).ĥa. MS kept the table structure intact: rows table headers table descriptors and regularity of rows and columns.Ĥb. SP threw out the alternate text and annotations for the images (this presents a major Accessibility issue).Ĥa. MS kept the alternate text and annotations for the images.ģb. SP threw out the tagging structure information (this presents a major Accessibility issue).ģa. MS kept the tagging structure information (tab order).Ģb. and Shaper, Implementer and Completer Finisher (the Action or Task roles). SP threw out the heading styles and changed them to paragraphs (this presents a major Accessibility issue).Ģa. This generates a Belbin Team Role Report which can be use in a myriad of ways. Headings were still headings, with the proper levels. MS kept the original Word "style" information intact for the most part. The following points are the significant differences I noted:ġa. So, I opened both files with a PDF object viewer to see how they were built. Upon closer inspection, I noticed there were several issues in both output files. At first glance they looked very much like the original source file.Ģ. Both the SP-converted file and the MS-converted file looked presentable. ![]() doc test file contains headings, paragraphs (some with indents), lists, tables, boxes, and 2 images.ġ. Microsoft Save to PDF Add-inįor brevity's sake, let's call them SP vs. Selecting a region changes the language and/or content on Shaper Pro 5.1 (from Burnaway) vs. In contrast, linked PDF images are not color-managed, even if color management is turned on for the rest of the document. Note: If you are color-managing artwork in a document, embedded PDF images are part of the document and therefore color-managed when sent to a printing device.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |